Service template

Audit traffic quality and acquisition risk

The illustrative network brings cheap installs but unusually low activation, more duplicate events and later refunds.

Request a first consultation

Business result

Verified retained customer contribution, not install volume alone.

Next step
Understand the cause
Working output
Project brief
Unit of analysis
Network × placement × install cohort × quality event
Decision owner
Marketing Analytics and Risk Lead

Hypotheses and diagnostic checks

  • Reconcile identities and inspect suspicious sources before testing exclusions.
  • Define a check that can answer: Are low costs accompanied by verified customer outcomes?
  • Define a check that can answer: Do source or identity anomalies explain the apparent quality gap?
  • Define a check that can answer: Which bounded exclusion can be tested without losing valid customers?
  • Record the observation that would disprove each explanation.

Acceptance checks

  • Suspicious observations are distinguished from confirmed invalid traffic.
  • Quality differences use comparable cohort ages and visible coverage.

Deliverables

  • A diagnosis with competing explanations and the next check
  • Agreed scope, source requirements, responsibilities and acceptance checks.
  • A working brief for a readiness and delivery conversation, not a completed investigation.