Service template
Audit traffic quality and acquisition risk
The illustrative network brings cheap installs but unusually low activation, more duplicate events and later refunds.
Request a first consultationBusiness result
Verified retained customer contribution, not install volume alone.
- Next step
- Understand the cause
- Working output
- Project brief
- Unit of analysis
- Network × placement × install cohort × quality event
- Decision owner
- Marketing Analytics and Risk Lead
Hypotheses and diagnostic checks
- Reconcile identities and inspect suspicious sources before testing exclusions.
- Define a check that can answer: Are low costs accompanied by verified customer outcomes?
- Define a check that can answer: Do source or identity anomalies explain the apparent quality gap?
- Define a check that can answer: Which bounded exclusion can be tested without losing valid customers?
- Record the observation that would disprove each explanation.
Acceptance checks
- Suspicious observations are distinguished from confirmed invalid traffic.
- Quality differences use comparable cohort ages and visible coverage.
Deliverables
- A diagnosis with competing explanations and the next check
- Agreed scope, source requirements, responsibilities and acceptance checks.
- A working brief for a readiness and delivery conversation, not a completed investigation.